本文章目前仅提供英文版本。本篇文章“Static vs Dynamic Testing: Understanding the Difference in Model-Based Development”目前仅提供英文版本。本文解释了在基于模型开发中动态测试与静态测试之间的差异。文中阐述了这两种方法如何有助于质量保证、分别能够回答哪些问题，以及为何将二者结合可以实现高效验证。
In modern software development, ensuring software quality is essential. This is especially true in safety-critical domains such as automotive and embedded systems.
In model-based development, engineers use models to design, simulate, and automatically generate code for complex systems. Because models often serve as the basis for production code, verifying their quality early in the development process is crucial. Late defect detection leads to costly rework and delays.
Two important verification approaches support this goal: dynamic testing and static testing.
Dynamic testing evaluates software or models by executing them and observing their behavior at runtime. Static testing, in contrast, analyzes software artifacts without executing them. As a result, they answer different questions: 'Does it work?' vs 'Is it built correctly?'
Both approaches help teams detect defects at different stages of development. When combined, they create a more effective verification strategy.
Understanding the difference between dynamic and static testing helps development teams apply the right technique at the right time.
